How Alltite Differs from Other Treatments
Alltite uses DLTD® technology, which combines the advantages of RF (radiofrequency) and HIFU (ultrasound), giving it different characteristics from conventional treatments that use a single type of energy. Here, we explain in detail how it differs from the following treatments.
- ONDA Lift
- InMode
- HIFU
- Ulthera
- Thermage
Understand the characteristics of each treatment and consider which one may be right for you.
How It Differs from ONDA Lift
Both Alltite and ONDA Lift are attracting attention as non-surgical treatments for sagging skin, but they differ in the energy used and the layers they target.
Alltite uses DLTD® technology, which combines the advantages of RF (radiofrequency) and HIFU (ultrasound), to deliver energy simultaneously to both the dermal and SMAS layers. It is a treatment that provides both lifting and improved skin firmness.
ONDA Lift, on the other hand, uses microwaves (2.45 GHz) and is characterized by its selective approach to fat cells. The microwaves are absorbed by water molecules within fat cells, promoting collagen production while dissolving and eliminating fat.
Regarding downtime, although Alltite uses DLTD® technology to reduce the burden on the epidermis, some people report that it feels “quite hot” because the energy reaches the SMAS layer. Redness or a flushed sensation may also occur after treatment, and downtime is characteristically somewhat longer than with ONDA Lift.
With ONDA Lift, the microwaves act selectively on the fat layer, resulting in relatively little stimulation at the skin’s surface. It is suitable for those who want to minimize pain and downtime.
Both are effective treatments, but Alltite is suitable for those seeking “lifting and improved skin firmness,” while ONDA Lift is suitable for those seeking “a more defined facial contour while reducing fat.”
For more information about ONDA Lift and other treatment options, please also refer to the following article.
How It Differs from InMode
InMode is a treatment device for sagging skin that primarily uses RF (radiofrequency). It differs from Alltite in the type of energy used and the layers targeted, and each treatment has different strengths.
InMode primarily uses RF (radiofrequency) to deliver thermal energy to the dermal and fat layers. By combining multiple handpieces, including Forma and FX, it can address overall facial tightening and fat reduction.
Alltite uses hybrid energy that combines the advantages of RF (radiofrequency) and HIFU (ultrasound). Its characteristic feature is that it can approach not only the dermal layer but also the SMAS layer. Because it can deliver energy to deeper layers than InMode, a more substantial lifting effect may be expected.
InMode specializes in “facial slimming and tightening.” Its RF thermal energy contracts collagen in the dermal layer and works on the fat layer to tighten the entire face. Its low levels of pain and downtime are also appealing, making it easy to continue as regular maintenance.
Alltite specializes in “lifting and improved skin firmness.” Its ultrasound energy approaches the SMAS layer to provide lifting at the level of the fascia. It is suitable for those who want to raise the position of the cheeks or create a sharper facial contour.
Both are effective treatments, but InMode is recommended for those who want ongoing facial-slimming and tightening effects, while Alltite is recommended for those seeking a substantial lifting effect.
How It Differs from HIFU
HIFU (high-intensity focused ultrasound) is widely known as a standard treatment for sagging skin. Alltite incorporates HIFU technology while evolving it by combining it with RF.
HIFU alone concentrates ultrasound energy on the SMAS layer, creating pinpoint thermal coagulation points. Although it can provide a powerful lifting effect, many people report that it feels quite hot and painful.
Alltite combines the advantages of RF (radiofrequency) and HIFU (ultrasound) through DLTD® technology. It is designed to deliver heat more mildly to both the dermal and SMAS layers simultaneously, allowing results to be achieved with less pain than HIFU alone.
HIFU alone may provide a substantial lifting effect through pinpoint treatment of the SMAS layer, but its approach to the dermal layer is limited. Alltite can approach both the dermal and SMAS layers in a single treatment, providing both lifting and skin-quality improvement.
HIFU may be suitable for those seeking a clear lifting effect through a powerful approach to the SMAS layer, while Alltite may be suitable for those who want both lifting and improved skin firmness while minimizing discomfort.
How It Differs from Ulthera
Ulthera is known as the “gold standard for lifting treatments,” with a high level of recognition and an established track record among HIFU devices. It has received FDA approval and is widely used around the world.
Ulthera delivers ultrasound energy to the SMAS layer in a pinpoint manner, creating thermal coagulation points that contract the fascia. Because treatment can be performed while checking cross-sectional images of the skin in real time, it is possible to approach the precise depth. Effects last approximately 1–2 years, and a substantial lifting effect may be expected from a single treatment. However, it is also known for causing significant pain, and anesthesia cream or nitrous oxide sedation is often used during treatment.
Ulthera provides substantial lifting through a powerful approach to the SMAS layer, while Alltite provides comprehensive anti-aging care that also includes the dermal layer in a single treatment. Ulthera may be an option for those who want a powerful lifting effect in one treatment, while Alltite may be an option for those seeking results while minimizing discomfort.
How It Differs from Thermage
Thermage is a representative device for treating sagging skin using RF (radiofrequency). Since receiving FDA approval in 2002, it has been used in several million treatments worldwide.
Thermage uses monopolar RF to deliver thermal energy over a broad area from the dermal layer to the subcutaneous fat layer. It may promote collagen fiber contraction and new collagen production, helping tighten the overall skin and improve firmness. The latest Thermage FLX is designed to reduce pain and improve results, allowing for a more comfortable treatment than earlier models.
While Thermage primarily provides a tightening effect from the dermal layer to the subcutaneous fat layer, Alltite can provide a more substantial lifting effect through its approach to the SMAS layer. Thermage is suitable for those who want to tighten the overall skin and improve firmness, while Alltite is suitable for those who want to lift sagging skin.
Comparison Table of Alltite and Other Treatments
We have summarized the differences between the treatments discussed above in the following table. Use it as a guide when choosing a treatment suited to your concerns and goals.
